Meeting Week 10 - 28th November

All attended - Elizabeth absent - had to work in order to get the next two weeks off.

Tasks as emailed by Amy:


ALL: an urban theorist sketch map and about three bullet point explaining key points.
Simon: research different types of housing and think about arrangements of housing. 
Janelle: Research different types of urban agriculture/farming and ways to integrate them with housing and industry on a small and large scale
Amy: Develop concept diagram - inspired by the work we have done today --> need to liaise with Liz to check what she's already done on this. develop art center idea
Irini: Produce a slide on existing transport structures.  Produce a slide showing the history of the site - mainly related to marsh and industrial development
Toby: Produce a page on context of site. Make your three maps more legible - increase size of key and font. Format them so the images do not have text banner to left, add bullet points to simply explain what they show. They may not be a need for all three - perhaps incorporate two on one page about flooding. Expand flooding information to include tidal flooding. is your land use plan a repetition of Liz's one? 
Liz: Theorist drawings x2, acquire more info on survey stuff that hasn't been found, look at transportation, housing densities etc. 





Meeting Week 9 - 21st of November

Absent - Toby, Irini, Amy - all on the Art and context field trip (lucky:)).

Today we had the German students visiting. We listened through all of the presentations again - and some of the students and their teacher gave critiques, asked questions and gave pointers to inform our design.

The German teacher suggested about floating housing filling up more of the site. An interesting idea.

I think that we need to work on our blog more, and add information from here that we have collected.

Next week we aim to be working towards the model - simon estimates a cost of 15 pounds each - best everyone comes with cutting equipment - craft knives or scissors.

Keep working on allocated tasks, or look on the to-do list - as circulated previously. 

Tidal range varies between 5 and 7 m - a video of the tidal range can be found here:

http://www.pla.co.uk/films.cfm

Look at the bottom for the vid - called time and tide.

The tidal range on the river section of the tidal Thames varies between 5 metres and 7 metres - that is the difference in the height between low and high water. The tidal range is dependent on whether the tide is on neap or spring tide cycle.  This has a number of impacts including when vessels can move on the river (bigger vessels need the deeper water of high tide) and the type of structures (bridges and piers) needed for getting passengers on and off boats on the river.

Things to be done

To try and deal with the tasks assigned, and so that people aren't waiting for orders from others ( as we do not have a group leader per se, I have come up with a list of tasks, so that people get on with work, without having being told to do a specific task - this way, if people miss a session, they can still get on with tasks, please feel free to add to/alter/amend as you see fit - these are just my ideas - not necessarily the right or wrong way to go about things - any input - greatly appreciated).


Things to be done: (I have listed these in order of priority – the first needing to be tackled before the other elements.).



Everyone to work on for next week – or be thinking about – so that we can apply to our design:
-       - Storyboard – the narrative – the driving force behind our design – the urban surgeons – was a really key, punchy idea – perhaps we could be scientists – this could be our eco experiment. Urban experiment – take us back to basics – in a futuristic manner. It has to be a line of argument to explain the urban development proposal. General format – this is what is good about the site , this is what is bad about the site – and this is how we propose to change the site.
-       Application of design theories to the site – urban design drawings (as per group projects today).

Please select a few things that you can work on for the next week:

-       Apply cell concept to the design.
-       Refine our ideas and concept.
-       Strategies leading to our design decision.
-       Rethink the circulation and transport – put more thought into it. Cleaner graphics – clearer.
-       A strong overriding vision for the site – has become a bit piecemeal – lost site of the bigger picture (or perhaps we didn’t articulate this well today – I don’t think we did – I definitely didn’t).
-       Refine concept diagram – needs to be more powerful (according to benz) – perhaps need to think more about how this relates to our site.
-       Need topography layer – interpolate contours.
-       A physical model – with topography (contour model).
-       Refine the survey information – cleaner graphics – general overview.
-       Flood maps – need to think about the flooding of the site more and the water.
-       SWOT applied to a site plan – detail areas of weaknesses.
Another to demonstrate the areas of strength and where we will utilize these strengths for our design.
-       Indicate the size of the site.
-       Work out the tidal range.
-       Slogan/soundbite.
-       Demonstrate where the road is on site plans – existing and after – improve colours – perhaps have two realistic versions – rather than blocky illustrator vectors. These can be used as comparative maps for survey overlays.
-       Creation of habitats.
-       Theatrical plan – need to create a narrative for the site – tie this into our presentation.



These are in no particular order – I feel they are not as important this week (I may be wrong).

-       EYE SORE its.
-       A brainstorm of ideas.
-       Final presentation – using powerpoint or premiere pro- I am happy to put something together with premiere pro or powerpoint – with everyone else’s input and ideas – guiding it graphically.
-        An animation of the site – sketchup?
-       Photomontages –before and after.
-       Mood board for each area.
-       Exploded axonometric for analysis?
-       Cross sections.
-       History of the site – looking backwards and then forwards – visual time line.



For later:

-       Agenda for change.
-       Cost plan

Get everyone to send info sketches etc et to go on our blog. 

Meeting Week 8 - 14th November

Meeting week 8 - Everyone present.

We decided to split into groups to work on separate elements of the project. We decided that we spend too much time talking about ideas, and not enough time being productive with our time.

Amy and I (Elizabeth), created the plan for our storyboard - incorporating a theatrical element to the design.
As algae in their simplest form are unicellular organisms - we decided that there would be an evolutionary theme to the project, being that we stem from simple unicellular structures. 

We decided in the end that we will be algae aliens, who want to reintegrate with earth - and establish our algae in an experiment at Barking Riverside.

This week if you could work on things on the to-do list - which I will upload onto here as well. Also, research algae and how it can be used on our site - so that algae is the main element behind our design - utilising it in all of its forms.

Next week, we will be working on the topographic model and starting to build a base.

If everyone can finish their urban theory drawings then we can apply this to our masterplan.

Toby and Irini worked on survey information.
Janelle and Simon worked on looking at the Thames and how to increase the amount of water going into the site. 

Amy and I also started thinking more about the concept diagram and have ideas to create a gif - demonstrate 5 key zones related to cells - this needs to be expanded upon.
Inner Life of the Cell
Harvard Animation

Meeting Week 7 - November the 7th

This week we had our interim crit - last week - all present at the tutorial decided that the best course of action would be to have Simon creating a 3d model to display the different areas of the scheme. I was to create a before and after plan in a comparable style and to with Amy's help - put the powerpoint together. Janelle was assigned to redraw the circulation diagram, and to refine the concept diagram and slogan.

Irini and Toby were absent due to illness, and we had altered the design quite a lot since then - so felt that these assigned tasks were the most important to complete. 

Where this failed, was that we needed today to guide the direction of our storyboard - and the things that are supposed to be included - i.e we didn't realise that we needed to touch on elements from the previous crit - strategies leading to our design, the application of design theory drawings to the site.

Here are the notes from Benz:

1 - 1st slide is not strong.
2 - Renewing Barking Riverside - looks like a microscope slide. 
3 - Masterplan looking interesting but a bit sterile ( I agree - this was just supposed to be a simple conceptual plan - to demonstrate the different areas - rather than a design plan).
4 - C alex pattern language - Gordon Cullen.
5 - Hobbit housing - earth sheltered housing (time to ditch this idea - I like it - but tutor consensus = a no, no - as Simon said earlier - less time spent on the housing idea - and more general layout of the site). 
6 - Pod system - is not right. Why not trains - pods are too capitalist - not social - true - but they are eco friendly and we are trying to encourage walking - but hey, lets scrap the pods - I will miss you too pods).
7 - USE - want to see how blue and green agenda dictates. 
8 - Biodiversity looks interesting.
9 - Floating houses - look at dutch example.

10 - Hobbit houses - need to integrate with landscape, marsh and boardwalks.
3D of hobbit houses needs a marsh background.
11- Photomontages are conceptual and do not sit happily in the landscape.
12 - Landform and flooding is so important - this needs to be one of the first things you need to do - look at Wallasea Island.
13 - Commercial centre looks interesting - I don't undertand it.
14 - Green Bridge to where?
15 - We needs to see strategic thinking before the masterplan. 

indicative grade C+/B

Duncan's feedback:

Think about the structure of your presentation a bit more. The story board should have helped here. 
- Industrial revolution - ecological evolution.
- Concept image is too small - could be more powerful.
- Existing site plan and proposed site plans are too faint (my bad - I did darken them up - but not enough).
- Be very careful with the term zoning. 
- Too much time spent on introductory information (woops - too tired, brain failure).
- Some interesting transport initiatives, but i'm not sure they have been thought through yet.
- A good range of sustainable sources of energy referred to - I look forward to seeing how they will be developed.
- The tidal range of the Thames at this location is?
- I'm missing an outstanding set of strategies. 
- Urban agriculture - how is this exploited/ fully realised?
- A huge amount of detail, but lacking a comprehensive strategic overview at this point.